- Biography
- Books
- Commentary
- Newspapers
- Asian Age
- Bloomberg Quint
- Business Line
- Business Standard
- Dainik Bhaskar (Hindi)
- Divya Gujarati
- Dainik Jagran (Hindi)
- Divya Marathi
- Divya Bhaskar
- Economic Times
- Eenadu (Telugu)
- Financial Times
- Hindustan Times
- livemint
- Lokmat, Marathi
- New York Times
- Prajavani (Kannada)
- Tamil Hindu
- The Hindu
- The Indian EXPRESS
- Times of India
- Tribune
- Wall Street Journal
- Essays
- Interviews
- Magazines
- Essays
- Scroll.in
- Newspapers
- Speaking
- Videos
- Reviews
- Contact
Politics of feebies promises a bleak future
| April 3, 2011 - 16:19
The stench of corruption travels quickly from Delhi. With the news that Tamilnadu chief minister’s daughter, Kanimozhi is soon to be charged by the CBI, the money trail in Raja’s 2G scam seems to be established. The noose is tightening and DMK’s PR machine is working overtime to spread ‘sincere lies’ before the state election on April 13. Each of the major parties--the DMK and the AIDMK--commands the loyalty of about a third of the voters. The Congress, DMK’s junior partner, controls 12% to 15% of the vote and Vijaykanth, AIDMK’s partner, holds around 9%. The AIDMK has the advantage of anti-incumbency but it will be a close contest. What should concern us, however, is another form of corruption raging under the bright Tamil sun that challenges our political morality.
The DMK believes it won the last election because it promised free television sets. To promise is one thing but the DMK government actually gave away millions of TVs! The sets were paid from the state treasury, not party funds. In the coming election, voters are being promised cable connections, fans, mixers, grinders, laptop computers, and 4 gm of gold for a poor bride’s mangalsutra. Tax payers in Tamilnadu are outraged but Kanimozhi asked, ‘what is wrong in giving people what they need?’ The people, however, wondered if free TVs had a link to the DMK owning a major Tamil television channel.
It is not that Tamils don’t value integrity. They just don’t expect it from their politicians. They believe cynically that politics is the art of the sincere lie and cite the example of Dhritarashtra in the Mahabharata, who flourished through hypocrisy and nepotism. Chennai is not so different from Hastinapur and Tamil voters would prefer to be openly bribed by sincere liars. Populist give-aways have always been a temptation. Roman politicians devised a plan in 140 B.C. to win votes of the poor by giving away cheap food and entertainment—they called it ‘bread and circuses’. Punjab’s politicians gave away free power and water to farmers, not only destroying their state’s finances but also their soil (as farmers over-pumped the water); as a result, Haryana has supplanted Punjab as the nation’s leader in per capita income.
The idea of free TVs and mixies is morally troubling. The election commissioner has pleaded helplessness saying that freebies contravene the law only when they are distributed before an election. Most of us, however, do accept state spending on public goods. Public goods are, for example, roads, parks, schools—these are open for everyone to use. However, spending public money on private goods (such as TVs) seems offensive. It is legitimate for the state to equip schools and public libraries with computers but not to give free laptops to a section of the people. Is erecting statues to oneself a legitimate use of public funds? Certainly not, but the Supreme Court has ruled otherwise. It has recently absolved Mayawati, arguing that the people of U.P. had elected her and could remove her at the next election if they objected to statues. There is a thin but important line about what is a public good.
Nothing quite explains Indian politics as the fact that we embraced democracy before capitalism. The rest of the world did it the other way. India became a full fledged democracy in 1950 with universal suffrage and extensive human rights, but it was not until 1991 that it opened up to the accountability of market forces. This curious historic inversion means that we learned about rights before we learned about duties. In the market place, one has to produce before one consumes and earn a salary before one can buy a TV. In the same way, an election is supposed to enforce accountability in competitive politics. A voter should vote on the basis of performance. Instead, the Tamil voter is going to vote for a free mixie. Because democracy came before capitalism, Indian politicians have a tendency to distribute ‘welfare’ before creating welfare-generating jobs.
It is ironical that Tamilnad should be the setting for this corrupt practice. The state has high literacy and a reputation for being one of India’s best governed and most prosperous. It has had a succession of good administrations no matter which party was in power. Food rations actually reach PDS shops and NREGA wages are actually paid to the deserving! With prosperity, Tamils have outsourced menial work and are now learning Hindi in order to speak to their servants from Bihar. But political morality evolves through experience.
Free TVs mean less money for investing in the future--in roads, ports, and schools. Eventually Tamilnad will pay a price—for without investment, growth will slow down. Ask the voters of Punjab. One day, the Tamil voter will also understand the trade-off—free TVs today mean a loss prosperous future for their children.